Cantor cites other reasons why Rome "fell." In a time of economic decline, localism reigned, and Romans everywhere resented the central government's increasing demands and increasing inability to deliver basic services. "Rome" was not an entity that many Romans were wholly committed to, and some hard-pressed aristocrats welcomed the Germans because they thought they'd cut their taxes!
But they deserved to be hard-pressed. Drawing a comparison to high Mandarin Chinese culture in the first millenium A.D., Cantor speculates that Roman aristocrats had become so culturally ossified, that they couldn't and wouldn't look for technological or economic solutions to a changing world. All they knew was how to live off slave labor and read Cicero--because reading Cicero helped you win lawsuits!
Failing to effectively manage the inevitable migration of people from south to north certainly poses problems. The greater danger, however, is a refusal to adapt to a changing world. The world is getting hotter. New diseases are constantly appearing. The population is growing and aging. The global flight of a deadly new flu, or the forced evacuation of tens of millions of people from low-lying coastal areas make our current illegal immigration problem look like small beer indeed. These problems need to recognized as such, as real problems, and we need new technology, new forms of community, and ways of defining and generating economic development to deal with these problems.
We also need a new commitment to the common good. The culture of cars, cul-de-sacs, and starving the beast is ill-equipped to deal with pandemics or a changing climate. And the public sector needs to demonstrate an ability to provide a good return on what the public invests with it







Recent Comments