La Vie en Rose: In a nutshell, every great artist leads a tragic life. The art, in this case, music, was superior. The tragedy was sufficiently pathos-inducing. It was a bit long, however. Ah! Tragedy! Art! Just keep it under 110 minutes!
Match Point. I have seen a ton of Woody Allen movies, and I couldn't tell you a thing about them. In other words, I find his work largely forgettable. But this one was different. It begins as another languid tale of infidelity among the idle rich, only in London rather than New York, but then morphs into a thriller that reminded me of The Talented Mr. Ripley.
Spoiler warning...
I choose to see the movie as morally serous and not cynical. Chris is a retired tennis pro because he's unlucky. The ball hits the net and falls on his side just a few too many times. But that "unluckiness" results in a marriage, a job with his father-in-law's firm, and a fatal attraction with his brother-in-law's girlfriend.
After the murder, when he tries to throw the evidence away, it hits the net and falls on his side, so to speak. But the irony is that failed attempt to destroy the evidence winds up implicating another person as the culprit. And yes Chris is not lucky at all for getting away with murder. He's trapped in a loveless marriage, and, as Chris himself admits to his erstwhile lover's ghost, to get away with murder is to be condemned to living in a world without God, and without justice.
It's one of Woody Allen's most thought-provoking films.
Recent Comments