State Fans Nation wades into the Free Expression Tunnel kerfuffle. The comment thread is a mostly intelligent and wide-ranging conversation on free speech, political correctness and, interestingly, campus beautification.
A little background: a railroad track bisects the N.C. State campus. There are three pedestrian tunnels that go underneath the tracks, and one, the Free Expression Tunnel, is available for spray-painting, to minimize illegal graffiti elsewhere on campus. After the November elections, four students painted slogans threatening the life of President-elect Obama. The University whitewashed the tunnel (which, if I recall correctly, they also habitually do in the run-up to Parent's weekend), and University Police contacted the Secret Service. They investigated, but as far as I know, no charges were filed. Now the University system is considering whether to adopt a system-wide hate speech policy. The NAACP wants the students expelled, and diversity training mandated for incoming freshmen.
I don't think that inciting violence is protected speech, although the lack of charges indicates that the offensive graffiti wasn't a serious bid to inflict bodily harm on the President-elect. It was four bozos who shot their mouths off, and between the social opprobrium they've experienced on campus (Judging by the comment thread at State Fans Nation, N.C. State is a different place than it was 20 years ago),
and federal agents picking apart their hard drives, they have surely been taught a lesson.
I'm agnostic about expulsion, and I think that a hate speech policy is going to be awfully difficult to implement fairly. The laws of the state already outlaw communicating threats. Diversity training, however, is probably a good idea, if for no other reason than to save dumb people from the consequences of their own stupidity.
One commenter argued that the Free Expression Tunnel is an eyesore, and is less a forum for free speech than it is the one and only tool for the TKEs to round up enough guys during rush to have a decent pledge class (my paraphrase). They ought to get rid of the thing as the first step in beautifying the campus.
It's true. N.C. State is not all that easy on the eyes. The dormitories of west campus, where I lived for two years, exude all the collegiate charm of a Soviet apartment complex. I wound up my time at State in a central campus high rise that might have looked great in the opening credits of Good Times. State's most famous architectural landmark is Harrelson Hall which can only be described as a three story hat box on stilts. It oozes that gee whiz ugliness of the worst that post war architects managed to come up with. I spent a lot of time in the fluorescent glow of its windowless, warren-like rooms. State's Centennial Campus is only marginally better--it reeks of the soulless sterility of a suburban office park.
Abolishing the Free Expression Tunnel would only disburse the graffiti throughout the campus. They should keep it; people need to maintain a strong stomach that goes with tolerating free speech, and bozos who do what those four did last November need to be prepared for just about everyone, including federal agents, to come down on them in a counter-exercise of free speech.
But what to do to beautify the campus? It's amazing, really, that a university with an architecture and design school and a college of agriculture and life sciences can have a mishmash of uninspiring, if not downright ugly buildings, and pedestrian landscaping. Why can't more of the campus look like the view from the 1911 building?
Part of the problem is that N.C. State is on the edge of a city. It's not downtown, in which case no one would give a second thought to aesthetics. I mean, no one says VCU or Georgia State are ugly campuses, even though they are, because no one expects them to be beautiful. N.C. State is close to Pullen Park, and has enough green space to raise expectations.
But it sits astride a railroad track, for God's sake. That automatically limits you. And since it's not nestled in a forest like Duke, or in a small town like Chapel Hill, it winds up looking like what it is--that part of the city that got build in the 50s and 60s. Nasty.
Part of fixing up N.C. State has to do with fixing up Hillsborough Street which is really looking dumpy. I was last there in February, and while I didn't get mugged or propositioned, I didn't, you know, feel like throwing on ye old letter jacket and having a pint with me chums either. I was too busy trying not to trip over slabs of concrete sidewalk that looked like tectonic plates riding over each other.
One of my classmates here at Union-PSCE is convinced that the looks of the buildings tell you something about the values of the institution. He came here not only because, for a seminary, Union-PSCE has a sizable collection, but also because the library is drop-dead gorgeous. In a recession it's going to be a hard sell to ask for money for pretty stuff, beyond what you need for operating expenses, but the University really needs to start making the case to the legislature that if you want to be a top-flight research University, you can't look like a forlorn K-Mart shopping center. And the City of Raleigh needs to do its part as well.
Recent Comments